Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam > Blaise Pascal Instituut > Girard Studiekring > COV&R 2007 > Abstracts Papers
Stephanie Perdew
Metaphors of Sacrifice in the Liturgies of the Early Church
Email - Profile - Subtheme # 3 - Paper
ABSTRACT
The
paper responds in particular to the following question laid out in the
description of Sub-theme 3, question a: How
may we understand violence in Scripture and in the theological tradition with
its notions such as the last judgment, the classical doctrine of reconciliation
by the blood of Christ, the focus in the Roman Catholic Church on the Eucharist
as some kind of a sacrifice while reducing and concealing the notion of the
Eucharist as a meal as much as possible?
With
the fall of the Jerusalem Temple to the Romans in 70 C.E., the Jewish ritual
setting for sacrificial worship was destroyed, and from the ruins of the Temple,
two new religions emerged: what would later become Rabbinic Judaism, and what
would later become Christianity.[1]
Both nascent religions grappled with questions of what would constitute
their scriptural canon and what would constitute Mishnah
and Talmud (in the case of Rabbinic
Judaism) or creed and doctrine (in the case of Christianity).
At the same time, the liturgical practice of each religion was evolving,
and neither religion adopted or re-instituted a program of animal sacrifice
according to Biblical (Levitical) law.
The
liturgical practice of each religion came to focus around meal and study,
although in different ways. Within
Rabbinic Judaism, the Sabbath meal took place in the home, and scripture study
took place in the synagogue. Among
Christians, scripture study and meal took place first in gatherings in private
homes (the earliest sites of Christian worship) and then in churches.
While the liturgical practice of sacrifice was abandoned by each religion,
Christian liturgy took up images of sacrifice and employed them in Christian
worship. These metaphors of
sacrifice were taken from scripture and from prior Jewish liturgical practice,
and were present in some Eucharistic prayers.
It
can be argued from a review of primary evidence that early Christians were quite
intentional in using metaphors of sacrifice for a meal which was not in fact a
sacrifice, and that their use of such language was self-consciously parabolic. Just
as Girard has argued that Jewish and Christian scriptures are texts in
transition showing us an evolution away from a reliance on sacrificial violence
toward the recognition of the innocence of the victim, Christian liturgical
language is also a text in transition trying to employ and reshape the language
of sacrifice, reorienting this metaphor toward images of self-giving, kenosis,
and vulnerability of God, self, and community. Outlining
the contours of this argument might allow contemporary Christians
to better critique their own tradition for allowing the metaphorical
language of sacrifice to slide toward literalism, and may open the possibility
of engaging in theological dialogue regarding whether the use of sacrificial
language in Christian worship is appropriate and in what sense.
And of course, at this point, the nuances of Girardian theory and the
insights of Girardian strategies for reading scripture can all be employed.
In
order to open up this path of discussion, it is necessary to examine primary
source material from the early centuries of the Common Era in order to
understand the various ways in which early Christians employed the metaphor and
language of sacrifice in their prayers. Primary
sources to be reviewed in this paper include Eucharistic prayers, liturgical
instructions, and theological commentary, including the Didache,
the writings of Justin Martyr, the Apostolic
Tradition and the liturgy of Addai
and Mari.
-----------------------------------
Rev. Stephanie Perdew
Ph.D.
Candidate in Liturgical Studies and Christian Origins, Garrett-Evangelical
Theological Seminary, Evanston,
IL 60201 USA
and Senior Pastor, First Congregational Church, United Church of Christ, 1125 Wilmette Avenue, Wilmette, IL 60091 USA, 001-847-251-6660 (telephone), 001-847-251-6130 (fax)
[1]
These two new religions were not mother and daughter (according to an older
model of emergence) but in fact sisters (or brothers or even twins), both
born from what was Second Temple Era Judaism.
See Daniel Boyarin, Border Lines: the Partition of
Judaeo-Christianity (