Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam > Blaise Pascal Instituut > Girard Studiekring > COV&R 2007 > Abstracts Papers
Paolo Barbaro
Who Cares about the Yasukuni Shrine? Reflections on Tolerance Issues and System Vulnerability in Modern Japan
Email - Profile - Subtheme # 2 - Paper
ABSTRACT
Japan
has a very long tradition of religious tolerance, freedom and creativity, but
also a modern history spotted by religious persecutions, proscriptions, and by
policies forcing nationalistic and illiberal principles on religious
institutions and traditions. The constitution imposed by the Allied Occupation
Authority at the end of the Second World War grants religious freedom, and
asserts the division between state and religion, but many shadow areas remains
in the Japanese system, and they concern both tolerance and vulnerability. A
fact which is regularly discussed on newspapers and in academic literature are
the visits of Japanese prime ministers to the Yasukuni shrine, where war
criminals are buried, which recurrently results in strong protests from
neighbouring countries and tensions between Japan and its former colonies. This
fact, together with other specificities of Japanese modern history which will be
treated in the paper, such as for example the terrorist attacks that a religious
sect conducted in Tokyo metro with chemical bombs, questions the definition of
the limits of tolerance and of a systems vulnerability. The shadow
areas of the Japanese system have a high epistemic value in the theoretical
discussion of tolerance and vulnerability, since they give an insight on the
causes of conservative policies in the only rich, post-modern, non-western
country.
The
present paper will proceed through the analysis of modern Japanese political and
religious systems, giving a brief historical introduction, and mainly focusing
on the triangular relationship between religious activities, policies and
identity issues. As a starting point for the discussion, the paper will present
the preceding researches on the subject, which show that in the Japanese case,
identity definitions, and internal political issues, are among the main causes
of religious violence, while intellectual and political elites can be identified
as main responsible for actively engaging in the promotion of religious violence
and intolerance policies.
Finally, the paper wishes to inspire future comparative analysis which will not be conducted in the present paper on related matters such as the relationship between tolerance, vulnerability, policies and cultural specificities in the developed countries, or American policies in post-war Japan and contemporary policies in Iraq and Afghanistan.
-----------------------------------
Paolo
Barbaro is a researcher at